Aug 26
Aug 20
PS3 slim and a price drop?
What a surprise!
I must say though that I don’t like the look of that new PS3 model one bit. It’s gone from looking like a sexy, sleek, high end gadget to random black box under the TV. The old one had style and character. This one just looks generic.
Although it does look kind of ugly, but, in my opinion, it doesn’t look that much worse than a black Xbox 360 or the original PS2.
I guess smaller is good for the masses and price drop is a great thing that everyone has been screaming for and will reinvigorate interest in the PS3 console. So good job Sony, for playing to your hardware design strong suit.
Finally the PS3 console is at a reasonable price and is in a position to really compete with the Xbox 360. On the flip side, Microsoft are upping the price of the Arcade SKU and are taking away the HDMI cable away from their Elite bundle (while, admittedly, there is a rumour of a price cut). And then you’ve got that rather unfortunate Game Informer survey which claims that the Xbox 360 failure rate is at 54 percent – and flawed though the survey may be, it’s still a scary number to come out.
My point is, this is an instance in a very long time where Sony’s been getting the good press and Microsoft’s the one getting the sharp end of the stick, instead of the other way around. And it’s about bloody time, too.
I am kind of bummed about the lack of backwards compatibility, though. My PS2 broke half way through me playing Snake Eater and I’d really like to finish that game someday. Regardless of what others may think of it, backward comaptibility is a factor that would encourage me to buy a PS3.
Modern Warfare 2
In the meantime the debate rumbles on - which platform will give the ultimate Modern Warfare 2 experience?
The anticipation of Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 is reaching feverpitch already and its not out until 10th November 2009. Bargains are widely on offer and on this price comparison site we found Modern Warfare 2 for the 360 hovering around the £40 mark for pre orders to be delivered on the relaese date.
Jul 28
Mark Easton, the BBC’s home editor, wrote an illuminating post on his splendid blog that suggests far more people are seriously injured on Britain’s roads than the government figures suggest.
Analysis by the UK Statistics Authority, the watchdog for official data, reveals the under-reporting of road accident casualties is a significant and intractable problem
Instead of 26,000 people suffering serious injury after road accidents last year, the Department for Transport accepts that the true figure may be closer to 50,000. And the UKSA fears that the under-counting may mean the issue does not get the attention it deserves.
“The published statistics may not be sufficiently reliable to meet all user needs”, the authority argues, demanding that the Department for Transport “explain and contextualise the limitations of the statistics more fully at the time of publication”.
This matters because the level of carnage caused by drivers shapes road safety policy. As the authority puts it today: “These statistics are used… to save lives and reduce injury on the roads.”
If twice as many people as previously chronicled are suffering serious injury, the arguments for greater use of measures to target bad and reckless drivers become more compelling.
The Department for Transport has long known that its data on road casualties is suspect.
As the National Audit Office recently put it:
“There have been a number of studies of under-reporting, dating back to the 1970s, and from the limited data available it is estimated that there may be about twice as many casualties as are reported, although very few fatalities are unrecorded.”
The question for government, though, is not whether the figures under-record. They accept that they do. “The issue,” as the most recent internal report puts it, “is how constant over time are the levels of under-recording, misclassification and under-reporting, especially of serious accidents”
In other words, it is the trend not the number that matters - and for the last decade, the government has been reporting a downward picture.
The good news is that while our roads have got substantially busier, deaths have declined from around 3,500 a year to 2,500. The less good news is that fatalities in motor vehicles are still among the most common ways for 15-34-year-olds in Britain to lose their lives.
Three times as many people are killed in road crashes than get murdered. More than a thousand more die in motor accidents than from illegal drugs.
In rural areas, where car use is more often necessary and where average speeds are higher, rates can be many times greater. The worst place for road deaths is the north of Scotland.
The average age of a road death victim is 36.9, and three-quarters of those who die are men - predominantly in their teens, 20s and 30s.
While the death figures are probably reasonably robust, MPs are worried about the injury statistics. Earlier this month, the chair of the Transport Select Committee, Louise Ellman MP, referred to the “national scandal” of death and injury on Britain’s roads and the absence of good statistics.
“The Committee was extremely concerned about the lack of reliability in the data on road injuries, particularly those in relation to serious injuries. (…) We want the Government to do more on that issue, as we are not satisfied that the information that we are getting is accurate.”
She also made the point that motoring fatalities simply don’t get the same headlines as those who die in plane or train crashes.
“It is self-evident. Indeed, it should make us think a little - that the scale of the carnage on our roads is not acceptable in any other mode of transport. We are talking about 2,500 people dead and more than 230,000 casualties, and, if those figures related to rail, sea or aviation, there would be national uproar. However, there is no uproar about them.”
Follow Mark Easton @ the BBC
Jul 23
The Shelf was delighted when our invitations to our favourite charity’s Annual Skimpy Clothes Exhibition arrived - Dress Code - minimal - and after weeks of anticipation we finally joined the tanned and toned at this splendid charity event.
Charity Swimwear Show
No not tatty second hand clothes picked up from high street charity shops - but glamourous haute couture of sizzling swimwear.
Fundraising has never been so much fun
In these days of global awareness charities are thinking of more and more creative ways to raise money that don’t compromise their own objectives. Many high profile organisations are quite right to disassociate themselves with professional fundraising events that serve to profit from fundraisers who are looking to be funded by the sponsorship money they collect to take part in some jolly event that takes their fancy. For example it wouldn’t look too good for a charity that is working to help those suffering the effects of climate change and global warming to have fundraisers stamp a massive carbon footprint by arranging a day flying a plane to perform a ‘charity’ parachute jump.
Swimwear fashion show
In this instance the theme of global warming was highlighted by the need for swimwear and sun protection as the temperatures rise.
Laughter a plenty when the opening model was a Borat look-a-likey sporting a eye-wateringly tight mankini followed by Bruno in lemon shorts and a knotted handkerchief - high camp beside the seaside.
Then followed the professional models demonstrating the latest swimwear designs - and golly they were stunning - like sitting in on a live Sports Illustrated Swimsuit video shoot.
During the interval free smaples of P20 sunfilter were handed out as a timely reminder that many sun cream products fail to adequately protect fair skin from intense.
The second half of the show was an opportuunity to showcase even mor revealing swimming costumes and beach style sexy lingerie - by the time the curtain drew the event to a closr the assembled audience were in rapture.
We at the Shelf are now considering switching our following of the mighty spurs and football to an all together more pleasing sport - beach volleyball.
Jul 10
A while ago we discussed a driving holiday in Spain and suggested some family attractions to visit in Costa Blanca. However with the prospect of a glorious summer in the UK we think that many people are reconsidering their holiday options.
UK Holiday
Recent reports of the stagnant economy are forcing more and more families to consider taking their summer holiday in the UK - or to give it a funky name a Staycation. Hard up families are beginning to explore the wonders of camping and are discovering that a camping holiday can actually be a relaxing comfortable healthy experience. For those who insist on luxury but at affordable prices glamping is all the rage - no need to buy and pack the most important items such as tents and sleeping bags - they are already waiting for you when you arrive at the site.
Many glamping resorts have opened up in the South West in the hope of attracting visitors from Europe as well as the UK. In fact the tourist industries of Devon and Cornwall have ironically benefited from the squeeze on the economy and are expecting to attract visitors who are keen to lower their carbon footprints and enjoy the seaside and beach life that the South West is famous for.
Run to the Sun
Depending on how far you expect to travel a staycation can rack up an eye-watering fuel bill as well as wear and tear on your family car - a vist from London to St Ives is not only tiring but is close to 800 miles round trip. Families are once again the delights of travelling by train - exploring the benefits of family railcards that simplify the cost of journies
Duplicate content?
The beauty of glamping is the provision of all necesary camping equipment so make sure you find out what you actually only need to take to avoid duplication.
Hire a car
Without the palavar or need to pack and carry camping equipment with you an thought from the shelf is to consider using local UK car hire companies and arrange to pick up a hire car at the station when you arrive - relaxed and rested from a fast, cool comfortable train journey. A short drive to your location and you will find everyting waiting for you - a tent ready erected, decent beds and essential camping equipment.
When you think about it the average family only uses a car to make a few visits to local attractions and for shopping trips so why clock up all that mileage and gallons of fuel to simply have the occasional use of your own car. Hiring a car makes sense.
Save money, have fun and enjoy your staycation in the UK.
There is much talk of the on/off nature of wind and how difficult it is to store electrical power. However, if there was the large scale adotpion of electrical vehicles then these would act as power stores, particualrly given that a car spends most of its life er… stationary. This subject is currently the focus of much study in the power indsutry and the car industry. For it to be realised will need organisation. Are the anarchists going to provide this?
In the case of Co2 already in the atmosphere, a carbon negative process called bio-char already exists. There is growing interest. To roll it out to useful places (such as Africa - where it would make a real difference to poor people) needs organisation.
Concrete solutions to some current climate change issues.
They will not be realised without government support. The people in the climate camps have a role - but in my view it is a negative role. We need solutions and soon. These come from people, but can only be implemented on a large scale by governments and or companies (i.e. capitalism). In the case of bio-char I have some very large corporations interested - since the role of these orgs it to engineer and produce low cost systems - there is no alternative to them - no other organisation has the resources or scale to do it.
So yes, whilst corporatism has caused the problem it could also provide the solution.